Nnamdi Kanu To Represent Himself As Legal Team Withdraws From Trial

In a startling twist in the ongoing trial of Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), the embattled separatist figure has opted to represent himself in court after his entire defense team, led by former Attorney General of the Federation, Chief Kanu Agabi (SAN), formally withdrew from the case.

The development occurred on Thursday at the Federal High Court in Abuja, where Chief Agabi informed the presiding judge that he and other Senior Advocates on Kanu’s defense team had resolved to withdraw from further representation. The seasoned lawyer explained that the defendant had “taken the case back from them,” signaling a complete breakdown in the attorney-client relationship.

The courtroom was thrown into brief silence as Kanu rose to address the judge directly, confirming the withdrawal and declaring his intention to personally conduct his defense.

“I will be representing myself for now,” Kanu said firmly. “That might change later.”

The presiding judge, visibly concerned by the development, asked whether the defendant would prefer the court to assign counsel to assist him. However, Kanu declined the offer, insisting on continuing unrepresented.

Proceeding immediately to argue orally, the IPOB leader challenged the court’s jurisdiction to try him, maintaining his long-standing position that his arrest and rendition from Kenya were unlawful and unconstitutional.

Kanu’s decision to self-represent adds a new layer of complexity to a case that has already spanned several years, marked by high political tension, security challenges, and recurring legal disputes over jurisdiction, bail, and fair trial rights.

The trial, which involves multiple counts of treasonable felony and terrorism-related offences, has been one of Nigeria’s most closely watched prosecutions in recent years, attracting both local and international attention.

Observers note that Kanu’s decision could significantly affect the pace and tone of proceedings, as representing oneself in such a complex case requires deep understanding of criminal procedure and constitutional law.

Court officials confirmed that the matter has been adjourned for further proceedings, with the next hearing expected to focus on the defendant’s fresh arguments regarding jurisdiction.

Meanwhile, security was again tight around the court premises, with operatives of the Department of State Services (DSS) maintaining heavy presence to forestall any possible demonstration by Kanu’s supporters.

Legal analysts say the latest development may either prolong the trial or set the stage for new legal maneuvers that could alter the trajectory of the case entirely.