Natasha, You Asked for War — Now Face the Consequences”: Prof. Mgbeke Unleashes Explosive Revelations

In a blistering and uncompromising message addressed to embattled senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, Dr Sandra Duru has delivered what she calls a long-overdue reckoning. In a tone dripping with fury and strategic precision, she accuses Natasha of a trail of alleged misconduct ranging from sexual harassment cover-ups and organ harvesting allegations to connections with criminal networks and even a buried murder case.

Prof. Mgbeke as she’s called, claims she initially chose discretion over destruction, providing only “a tiny fraction” of evidence to international authorities and institutions such as the United Nations, UK Parliament, European Union, Amnesty International, and the International Criminal Court. However, following what she describes as Natasha’s “latest stunt” and failed sabotage attempt, Prof. Mgbeke declares that the gloves are now off.

“Let’s get something straight: I am NOT the one to be messed with,” she writes, claiming her case is sealed, verified, and bulletproof. Accusing Natasha of using “hired pawns” and launching media attacks and false accusations, she says all these tactics have backfired.

Prof. Mgbeke further reveals that she is in possession of recorded conversations in which Natasha allegedly incriminated herself, calling it “a full recording” that was unsolicited. She accuses Natasha of manipulative behavior and states that former colleagues have begun verifying her claims under oath, including a company Natasha previously worked with.

“Who meets a total stranger and talks about everything in a short time?” Prof. Mgbeke questions, branding Natasha an “unstable pathological liar” and bestowing upon her the title of “Dumbest Lawyer of the Century.”

The climax of the message is unequivocal: Prof. Mgbeke is turning over all gathered evidence to both civil and criminal authorities, ending with a confident farewell that echoes like a final gavel strike in court.

“You asked for war, but you came unarmed,” she writes. “Good luck. You’ll need it.”

This public declaration may be the opening salvo in what promises to be a high-stakes legal and reputational showdown.