Texas Court Jails IPOB Supporter For Skipping Child Support While Donating $49,000 To Separatist Group

A Texas court has found a Nigerian-born man in contempt after evidence showed he failed to pay court-ordered child support for his three children while consistently donating large sums of money to an overseas political movement.

The individual, Johnson Ibeawuchi, an Imo State indigene who has lived in Texas for 17 years, was ordered to pay $2,100 monthly in child support following his divorce in May 2022. While he complied initially, payments stopped after October 2023, prompting his ex-wife to seek enforcement through the state’s child support authorities.

At a January 2026 hearing, Ibeawuchi told the court he lacked funds to hire legal representation. The court granted him additional time to either reach a payment agreement or make an initial payment toward his arrears. He failed to do either.

When the case resumed on February 6, 2026, prosecutors presented four years of bank records that dramatically shifted the case. The documents showed that between July 2021 and August 2025, Ibeawuchi made regular monthly donations of about $1,000 to IPOB Worldwide Ltd., totaling approximately $49,000.
Under questioning, Ibeawuchi acknowledged the payments and told the court he believed supporting the “liberation of the Igbo people” was an investment in his children’s future. He argued that the donations began before the child support order was issued.

The court rejected the explanation, ruling that Ibeawuchi willfully prioritized political contributions over his legal and parental responsibilities. He was found in contempt and sentenced to jail, though the judge granted a two-week window to avoid incarceration.

To purge himself of contempt, Ibeawuchi must immediately pay 25 percent of the outstanding arrears and enter into a formal payment plan for the remainder. Failure to do so will result in imprisonment.
The case has sparked widespread debate online about personal responsibility, diaspora activism, and the limits of political sacrifice—raising a blunt legal question the court answered decisively: child support obligations come first.